The property of the Japanese version of the Recovery Knowledge Inventory (RKI) among mental health service providers: a cross sectional study

Table 4 Results of confirmatory factor analysis: comparison of goodness-of-fit indices between four-, three-, and one-factor RKI models (N = 299)

Model	GFI	AGFI	CFI	RMSEA	Chi square	df	p
4-factor ^a	.93	.90	.91	.053	179.59	98	.00
3-factor^b	.89	.85	.76	.080	295.63	101	.00
1-factor^c	.87	.82	.77	.093	274.96	77	.00

Four-factor model derived in the original study by Bedregal et al. [17] is not shown because of an improper solution in this study
GFI goodness of fit index, AGFI adjusted goodness of fit index; CFI confirmatory fit index, df degrees of freedom; better fit model denoted by italic letters
^a20 items loaded on a four-factor structure in the present study
^b16 items loaded on a three-factor structure by Happell et al. [9]
^c14 items loaded on one factor structure by Wilrycx et al. [31]

ISSN: 1752-4458